I seem to have endured a flurry of dopamine-click-led not-entirely-well-advised online book ordering. Things keep arriving, often things that are not quite what I imagined they'd be when I ordered them, if I remember ordering them at all.
An elderly yet still robust copy of Brigid Brophy's The Snow Ball
arrived today (discussed brilliantly on Backlisted here
). That can only be a good thing.
And this week I sat right down in the middle of the Salinas Valley (page 353) to read Neil Gaiman's Norse Mythology
I hadn't read any Gaiman in a good while. I thought it would be happy to check back in with him, and with the Norse myth-world of my childhood.Norse Mythology
's dust jacket
is beautiful: a soft matte black infinity dusted with stars, with a lustrous Mjolnir in the centre.
Some of my favorite stories from the mythos are in Gaiman's book (the forging of Mjolnir, the birth of Sleipnir), and some I didn't know as well (the mead of poetry). Some of the gods I feel most affinity for are less prominent (Baldur, Bragi).
Gaiman and I are both totally hot for Loki, so that works out, because Loki kind of is the protagonist both of this retelling and, arguably, the mythos itself. I'm not a traditional storyteller or an anthropologist, but it seems to me that Gaiman picks up on the culture-hero role of tricksters like Loki as creators and bad/fortunate role models.
I’ve loved Gaiman's use of this mythos in other works: Sandman
especially, and American Gods
. Norse Mythology
itself isn't a wholly successful adaptation for me.( Why? )
Ultimately, reading Norse Mythology
made me want to re-read the book of Norse myths I had (or at least read) as a child. I did a search; the book must almost certainly be the d’Aulaires’, probably in the 1967 version.
I found it in a Popular Online Bookstore, and then, on even sexier second thought, at the local library.
Now I will say positive things about a book, to prove I can.
Just when East of Eden
was fading me out, Steinbeck dropped deeper into the workings of Cal's character, and my faith flared up again. Steinbeck is very good at imagining the inner lives of people without ordinary empathy. I find it exhausting to be in those minds for such long stretches, but this is not the same as the work not being well done. The work is done very well.